Category: Lights 'n Shadows
Yet another effort to capture the ghost trails ... this time in inner ring road, Bengaluru:

Atleast this time I realized that, rather than using a very low 'f' value like f/32 to ensure better focus, it may be better to use something like f/6.3 and get clean red lines in a shorter time (about 10seconds). When the exposure was abt 2minutes, as I did last time, the trails get smudged and dirty. This time, with a lower exposure time, it was cleaner and clearer thick lines. Guess ... I need more experiments .. sigh!!!
I have had a pic before, trying to do the same. I guess, a stronger light (full headlight minus high beam), less bumpy road and a better camera/lens, had made the beam kinda straight. I used f/8 for this pic, about 12-13 seconds to expose the Versa staying still and a total of 18 seconds, including the motion capture. Earlier, I had tried f/6.3 and the beam looked a bit too strong.

I had attempted to take the ghost trails of vehicles numerous times ... and has not got it to my satisfaction till date.
The second one is from the ramp while coming from inner ring road and looking towards Indiranagar. f/32 again with a 154 seconds exposure. What I liked in this pic is the light coming from the lamp post with that elongated spokes looking like stars. The ghost trails itself is a little over exposed and could have been better off from somewhere a little higher and away from those high beams. I did try to cover up the lens whenever a high beam shows up in the horizon but there were too many of them to effectively do this!

Earlier, I've hardly used any ISO value other than the minimal one offered by the camera. In S2IS, it was ISO-50 and with EOS 400D it is ISO-100. Infact, I felt that EOS 400D should also have had an ISO-50. If not for higher clarity, it should have helped me to get longer exposures / wider shutter in some cases.

The first pic is a good example of how a normal looking frame can be spoiled by wrong metering. With a bright afternoon sky in the background, the camera will always report a lower exposure thereby giving a dark image of the palace. It is there by necessary to either go to partial metering mode or to increase the exposure manually to make sure that the subject is not under-exposed. In this pic, I had used 1/200s, 4 times more than what was suggested by the camera.
With Dasara around the corner, the palace was expected to come up with bright lighting around it. This particular pic was taken with just the initial lighting with a high exposure (f/16, 10s). I was expecting the lower shutter width will give me a good enough DOF to cover the entire range and also to compensate any mistakes of focusing in the dark.
Once the lights were on at 7PM, I frantically tried a lot of pics in different angles and distances but was found wanting with my 18-55mm EF-S lens unable to give me a full view of the palace. Finally after I packed up the tripod and was walking back, I realized that the whole palace can be covered if I tried from an angle! And here it is ... this pic was actually taken in a hurry @ 18mm, f/22, 6second exposure.
Canon has a very useful mode of operation called A-Dep, where the camera will choose the 'f' value small enough to make sure all the nine AF points are in focus (and subsequently an exposure time suitable for this 'f'). This mode can give a fair idea of Depth of Focus when u r in doubt.
One thing to remember here is that, if any of the AF points fall out of the subject (lets say to a far away object), the calculation can go really wrong. If this happens, most of the times, camera will end up with something like f/32 or flash saying, it could not find any proper 'f' value. Result may be a pic with a lot of distractions and / or blurring due to higher exposure value.